Part Two: Chain of Title
Do you have the rights? Yes. Are you sure? Yes... Okay, I'd better make sure.
TRACES
9/5/20248 min read
As some of you know, Traces, a film I wrote, directed, and co-produced, was recently released in the UK.
So, I thought it would be fun to share some behind-the-scenes stories. If you have no idea what Iโm talking about or why thereโs a Part Two in the title, check out Part One here. Iโll wait.
Also, itโs getting crowded, so I think it best to throw up some credits:
NarratorโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆMCH
Lawyer/Executive Producerโฆ....................................Paul
Producerโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆ.Dan
The DirectorโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆCharlie
Sleazy Financierโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆ..Steve
Supercool Financierโฆโฆโฆโฆ..............โฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆLawrence
The Conniverโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆ...โฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆโฆHimself
๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฉ๐ญ: ๐๐จ ๐๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ๐ฌ?
When we returned from the road trip, refreshed and with a new appreciation for KOAs, Route 66, and Cody, Wyoming, my lawyer Paul and the producer (Dan) invited me for lunch in Redondo Beach to discuss When We Were Seventeen. I knew this was good news, or at least encouraging news, as you donโt invite someone who lives in The Valley out to the West Side (Paul and Danโs home turf) just to say:
โSorry, weโre not going to make your movie. Lunch is on us; try the shrimp scampi.โ
That shit can be said on the phone. Paulโs a good man; it was good news if he wanted to meet me face-to-face.
The fact that it was all the way out in Redondo Beach as opposed to somewhere in the middle like, say, Century City or even Mid-Cityโฆ Well, I canโt say for certain, but Iโm pretty sure that was a strategy play by Dan. โLetโs see how bad he wants it.
๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐๐ฎ๐๐๐ซ
You may remember Dan from the last Facebook posts where I referred to him simply as The Producer. Shortsighted on my part because:
A) He is a singular being and not an amalgam of โproducersโ as is usually true when writing these things.
B) Dan plays a very integral role in this odyssey and calling him โthe producerโ seems impersonal and cartoonish, especially during some of the more rancorous displays of power he was prone to have. Like, say, scheduling a lunch meeting in Redondo Beach instead of Beverly Hillsโฆ Hell, Culver City would have been more accessible, for Godโs sake! (Anyone who has ever driven the 405 Southbound knows what Iโm talking about).
I met Dan through Paul two years earlier. Paul had known Dan since he was nineteen years old. Paul had been a great mentor to Dan, and I understood they had worked together often; Paul handled all legal aspects, and Dan handled the physical production. Together, they worked on quite a few movies.
It was one of those movies, a nasty little creature feature I was a rather big fan of called Splinter, that made Paul think Dan would be the perfect producer for my meta slasher ๐5๐๐ถ๐ปโa screenplay of mine I was co-producing and slated to directโthat I had optioned to a financier named Steve. Under the impression the financing was somewhat in place, Dan had worked with Steve and me for the better part of a year until everything imploded. Surprise, surprise, Steve was a fraud who had no money. Welcome to Hollywood.
When I asked Dan if he wanted to produce When We Were Seventeen (back when I was going to star and my buddy was going to direct), he was understandably reticent. And then, when it fell apart I figured with the one-two punch of that and the P5YCH debacle, the working relationship was done. Yet, when I walked into the Redondo Beach restaurant that afternoon, he was, at the table with Paul, ordering a Cobb salad.
๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฐ๐ฒ๐๐ซ
Itโs here, I should say; I like Paul, still to this day. Heโs a decent man. He helped protect my IP after Steve threatened to sue me and entrap me into breach of contract. He always took my calls, listened to my terrible pitches, brought me in on some exciting meetings and opportunities when I was considering getting into the distribution game, and even years after we stopped working together, Paul counseled me through some pretty scary legal situations that had nothing to do with entertainment law (some asshole tried to sue me for A LOT of money after a car accident). And he did that for free. Plus, heโs a hell of a musicianโweโll get to that in a bit.
Were mistakes on both sides made? Sure. Does he still represent my legal interests? No. Would we ever work together again? Maybe. Is he one of the good guys in this crazy industry? Abso-fucking-lutely. Paul is one of the great guys, and I still consider him a dear friend. So I sit down.
Paul: โDan did a proper budget for When We Were Seventeen.โ
๐๐๐ง: โWe shouldnโt make this for $250,000 or even $450K. We should shoot this for just under a million.โ
๐๐: โWait. Are we making ๐โ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐?โ
Paul: โI have three people I want to take this to for financing. There are no guarantees. But I think I know someone who will love this script.โ
๐๐๐ง: โAre you sure youโre ready to do this?
๐๐: (I didnโt even hesitate) โYes.โ
I asked Paul if there was anything I needed to do about Charlie I was working with on this. Even though he bailed, I wondered if he had any legal rights to the script because we both worked on it.
Also, hereโs the thing with any great director: They will ALWAYS work on the script with the writerโฆ always. I have never met a seasoned director who hasnโt put their stamp on a screenplay. Not out of egoโany director worth their salt will rarely take credit for their contributionsโbut out of service to a vision and a sense of artistic obligation that just comes with experience. The best of them will always let the writer take all the credit.
I was so fucking gun-shy ever since ๐5๐๐ถ๐ป and the drama with Steve that I wanted to make sure I was doing everything right. Paul assured me that because I was the one who wrote the screenplay, which was based on my (embellished) experiences, it was MY screenplay. At best, Charlie would be entitled to a "Based on an Idea By" or, if I was feeling generous, a "Story By" credit.
I asked what the right thing to do was, and Paul, always the calm, forthright pragmatist, just said:
โHave a conversation with Charlie and tell him your intentions. Be honest. Better yet, ask him if itโs okay to go out and give it a shot. Tell him youโll give him a โStory Byโ credit.โ
And thatโs precisely what I didโฆ Sort of.
๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐
It was early spring of 2015. I met Charlie at The Federal (again)โฆ and he was in better spirits. He had booked another television show and was about to shoot it in Atlanta. I told him I was interested in taking out ๐โ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐ and asked for his blessing. He knew that my pull to be behind the camera was getting stronger, and I had set my sights on directing. I had shot a cool Proof of Concept for my film P5YCH, produced a few short films, and had just been paid to write my second screenplayโฆ so it was clear my days in front of the lens were waning.
๐๐: โI want to try and make ๐โ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐.โ
Charlie: โGo for it. You donโt even need to give me a 'Story By' credit.โ
I thought it was weird that he led with โYou donโt even need to give me a โStory Byโ creditโ without promptingโฆ but I swear he did.
Iโve come to discover this is a code of ethics thing true Hollywood professionals do to ease writersโ worry about any potential legal blowback regarding the scriptโs chain-of-titleโIโve worked with many A-list screenwriters, directors, and producers who have helped develop my workโmost notably Dean Devlin, who said the same thing to me after releasing the option on a screenplay of mine he helped shape and was going to produce. And itโs something I do as well.
Anywayโฆ
๐๐: โIโll give you a 'Story By' credit.โ
Charlie: โNo need. You did all the work. I hope you get it made someday.โ
โSomeday,โ as in one day, is far from now, and not โweโll find out in a week or so if Lawrence (weโll meet him soon) liked it.โ Which, incidentally, was the last thing Paul said to me about an hour before I went to this meetingโฆ Why couldnโt I tell Charlie this? He said he had no interest in making this movie. Why couldnโt I just say: โWell, funny you should say that because โsomedayโ might be sooner than we think.โ
This is something I would regret for a very long time. And while I never lied, it was a lie of omission. One I justified because he never thought to ask the question directly: โOh. Is someone interested in financing the movie?โ
And why would he? Charlie and I knew how insanely difficult it was to finance a movie, especially for a first-time filmmaker. Looking back, this is what I should have said:
๐๐: โI have an opportunity to make ๐โ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐. We all know itโs nothing until itโs something, but before I go any further, I wanted to talk to you and let you know that weโre actively taking it out. Iโd like your blessing to discuss credit. I think itโs fair that I have โScreenplay by,โ and we share โStory Byโ credit. What do you think?โ
But I didnโt. When he said, โTake it,โ and then offered, without prompting, โI donโt even need a โStory Byโ credit,โ it was his way of saying, โThis is what we do. We work alongside our writers. This is our credo. This is our code.โ
But thatโs not what I heard. What I heard was:
Take it. None of this matters because youโll never get ๐โ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐ made, anyway. Not without my money. Best of luck, kid.
Look, if Iโm being honestโฆ a part of me was still angry about what he didโbailing on the project after all the work weโd done. All the work Iโd DONE! Maybe this was my revengeโฆ maybe a part of me wanted to say, โfuck you, man. I trusted you. And you let me down. Again. Well, now Iโll show you!โ
That part of meโฆ The Conniver Heโs got one job-- to justify any poor decision I make through the subtle dance of projection and justificationโThe Conniver convinces me that what I did was right, and he has the receipts to prove it.
Children do it all the time, except when they do it, itโs not projectionโฆ itโs a lack of executive function.
โTimmy? Why did you take Sallyโs ice cream cone?โ
โBecause it looked yummy.โ
"But now sheโs sad.โ
โSo give her another one.โ
To clarify, in this little scenario, Timmy is four. I was FORTY. Hereโs how the conversation went with all three of us at the table. (Guess which one is the Conniver?)
๐๐: โI want to try and make ๐โ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐.โ
Because โfuck youโ for leading us on and wasting our time last year!
Charlie: โGo for it. You donโt even need to give me a 'Story By' credit.โ
Dude, as if we would.
๐๐: โIโll give you a 'Story By' credit.โ
Did you not hear what he said? Hey. This is the guy that bailed. Oh, remember the last falling out you had? When he bailed THAT time?
Charlie: โNo need. You did all the work. I hope you get it made someday.โ
MCH, donโt you fucking dare tell him about Paul. He had his shot. This is our time.
๐๐: โYeah, hereโs hoping.โ
And that was it. I left the meeting, and my rights were secured. I was happy, filled with hope and promiseโฆ for about 30 seconds. And then I heard it. Loud and clear.
Not that you needed the rights secured; the script had been registered in your name with the WGA from the beginning. This is YOUR story.
Oh shit. I was in trouble with that voice inside my head. Hell, I even wrote a song about himโฆ called ๐๐ ๐ด๐ถ๐ธ๐.
๐ป๐ ๐ฉ๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
โฆ
ยฉ Copyright 2024 Fast Draft Inc. All Rights Reserved | Website by: Darling Design